About Me

Name: Bert Chapman
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Post-Election Ruminations

After much promise, the 2012 election turned out to be a disappointing letdown for conservatives.  Despite Obama's record of failure and incompetence, the American electorate decided to adhere to the words of Proverbs 26:11 and returned to their Obama vomit just as a fool repeats his folly.  The President's campaign was helped by a sycophantic mainstream media that ignored his failures in domestic, social, and foreign policy, especially the Libyan consulate fiasco, was successful in demonizing Romney's successful business career including his factually correct, if statistically questionable, assertion that 47% of Americans were going to vote for Obama anyway due to their financial dependence on the government.  The President's campaign also had a propaganda campaign that would please Nazi Germany's Joseph Goebbels, the Soviet Union's Joseph Stalin, China's Mao Zedong, and the North Koreans with its spooky ad of brainwashed liberal kids claiming Romney would pollute the air and various other crimes.

The Romney campaign's overall grade should be a B- which I know will be considered to generous by some conservatives.  They did a good job of stressing the importance of restoring economic freedom and promoting growth, but they failed to point out the direct causal link between our national debt and the increasing dependence of many individuals on government programs due to their personal irresponsibility.  Romney was not nearly aggressive enough in attacking Obama for his incompetence on Libya and in the 2nd debate he should have pointed at Obama and told him that this episode alone proves he is unfit to serve as Commander-in-Chief.
I know the Romney campaign sought to come across as more appealing to women and independent voters but in dealing with a hardcore campaign like the Democrat Chicago machine you have to play smashmouth politics.  Romney's campaign should also have been more aggressive in attacking Obama for his administration's assaults on religious freedom and for not emphasizing the importance of judicial appointments.

The Senate campaigns, initially so promising, turned out to be failures.  I'm glad Deb Fischer won in Nebraska and Jeff Flake in Arizona but the senatorial choices in Indiana and Missouri  (Richard Mourdock and Todd Akin) were absolute fiascos.  I'm strongly prolife, but you have to include rape and incest exceptions in your campaign rhetoric to avoid frightening some women voters and making yourself vulnerable to attack from abortionist harridans.  GOP parties in all states need to thoroughly vet potential candidates to minimize the possibility of political hari-kari rhetoric such as that spouted by Mourdock and Akin.  These candidates need comprehensive training on how to respond to media "gotcha" questions.  While I have some sympathy for Tea Party concerns, they need to work with traditional conservatives on electing candidates who are concerned with promoting conservative reform governmental policies instead of spouting babbling anti-government rhetoric.  It's time for professionalism and discipline instead of amateurish delusions.

Despite losing a couple of seats in the House, we still retain reasonably complete control of that body which will serve as a brake on Obama's extremism.  We can be thankful that Darrell Issa and the Oversight and Government Reform Committee will be able to continue their dogged investigations of Obama Administration follies and crimes which will accelerate in the years go come.  Cong. Issa should give his staff and majority committee members some rest now, because they will be as busy as bees during the 113th Congress.  Paul Ryan will still chair the House Budget Committee and work diligently to restore fiscal sanity to government spending.  We also have rising stars such as Florida Senator Marco Rubio and New Hampshire Senator Kelly Ayotte along with solid governors such as Louisiana's Bobby Jindal.  Jeb Bush could also be a key player in future GOP aspirations.

Historically, 2nd presidential terms have not been the most successful.  Only God knows what will happen with the fiscal cliff's approach, but we will continue experiencing sluggish growth, probably increasing unemployment, health care costs rising beyond normal inflationary pressures, rises in national debt, and continuing aggression against our interests from hostile foreign countries and transnational terrorist groups.  When such attacks come from the Islamic world we will also, undoubtedly, hear the continuing excuses about the need to be "sensitive" to Islamist "feelings" instead of addressing the root evil of the Islamist world view.  Americans will have to learn the  hard way that Obama is congenitally incapable of governing in a pragmatic and centrist manner given the election results.  His unbounded arrogance will cause him to continue pursuing statist solutions to economic problems which will make them worse and cause our continued decline.  He will continue appealing to our ignorance and debauched natures with the most pathetic example of this being a recent poll which blamed Bush Administration policies for being responsible for our current economic problems.  These problems have been in place for several decades, include policies pursued by both parties, and a national refusal to recognize the need for limits in personal and national expenditures.

Post campaign rumination has also seen talk that Republicans need to accommodate changing demographic realities.  It is true that the Hispanic portion of the population has increased and the white percentage is declining.  We need to work to convince Hispanics that, in the long term, their material success is dependent on promoting personal economic empowerment and lessening their dependence on the government.  We need to let Hispanics know that they can contribute much, and have contributed much, to our societal fabric and that the Democrats seek to appeal to their basest natures and make them dependent peons on the federal government.  We also need to let them know that such big government policies are antithetical to their strong sense of family cohesion as are Obama Administration policies attacking religious freedom.  Democrats will have continual trouble juggling the aspirations of non-white politicos for often competing funding aspirations at a time of protracted fiscal constraint.  The GOP should work to exploit these inevitable tensions.

Concerning immigration, we need to stress the importance of adhering to national laws while emphasizing that we value the contributions of Hispanics and other immigrants with valuable work skills, expertise, and strong moral values.  Florida Senator Marco Rubio, Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval, and New Mexico Governor Susana Martinez can play big roles in getting this message out to national Hispanic audiences.  Republicans also do not need to compromise our values on social issues like defending traditional marriage and unborn children.  We need to do a better job of showing the direct linkage between poverty, income, educational attainment, and rising and economically unsustainable public assistance programs due to morally irresponsible personal behavior.  Contrary to the claims of secularist wonks, there are direct links between immoral and irresponsible personal behavior and societal political, economic, and social problems. 

God remains in control and reports of a conservative demise have been issued in the past by the liberal cognoscenti and have failed to materialize.  We must stand strong for our values and principles including fiscal discipline, a strong, assertive, and unapologetic foreign and national security policy, and standing for personal moral responsibility and self-discipline.  It will take a lot of pain, but eventually the country will come to curse itself for its foolish support of Barack Obama and his egocentric statist delusions.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Choice Beckons

After two years of constant travel, incessant media coverage, thousands of sound bites, hundreds of millions of dollars in campaign expenses, and rhetoric ranging from the sublime to ridiculous America faces a fateful electoral choice.  Four years ago, frustrated with two protracted wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and financial market turmoil, America let itself be seduced by a skilled rhetorical promising "change we can believe in."  However, this "change" was really failed economically interventionist, morally libertine social policy which attacked religious freedom, and foreign policy appeasement which genuflected before Islamist terrorism and resurgent Russian nationalism.

Barack Obama's presidency has been an abject failure by all economic, national security, and social policy criteria.  Our national debt is higher, personal dependency on governmental programs is higher, unemployment is higher, and economic growth is stagnant and threatens to decline even further after January 1, 2013 due to the expiration of the 2001 Bush tax cuts and the onset of sequestration.
Yet Obama continues blaming his predecessor George W. Bush for these problems and refuses to take responsibility for his own egregiously incompetent leadership.  He and his scions call for the electorate to take revenge on Mitt Romney and Obama's evil Chicago machine aid Valerie Jarrett vows to show no restraint on administration critics in a second term.  This rhetoric emanates from a man who in 2008 unctuously proclaimed that failed leaders criticize their opponents.  My, how the worm has turned.  Barack Obama is an exhausted volcano who is counting on an army of imbeciles, moral degenerates, and promoters of ethnic and gender victimhood to return him to office for four more years to continue America on its road to serfdom as the 20th century Austrian economist Fredrick von Hayek once prophesied.

There is another choice for America and his name is Mitt Romney.  We need a President of high moral character who understands American exceptionalism and encourages Americans to recover their entrepreneurial ingenuity and strive to reach their optimum God-given potential.  As President, Mitt Romney will make the tough choices necessary to restore the promise of America and begin the painful and protracted process of restoring national fiscal solvency.  Mitt Romney will let Americans and their doctors make health care decisions instead of unaccountable federal bureaucrats.  Mitt Romney knows that life begins at conception and will protect the unborn and he also knows that marriage must be between a man and woman for effective societal economic and moral development.

Since my state of Indiana let itself be seduced by Obama's blarney in 2008, there has been a return to traditional Hoosier conservatism and Romney will comfortably win our 11 electoral votes.  We have not seen much presidential tv advertising in the Hoosier State and I was unable to get a Romney/Ryan yard sign from the Tippecanoe County GOP headquarters who told me the campaign was prioritizing these for battleground states.  During mid-October my wife and I were in Washington, DC and central Virginia.  As we were driving southeast of Culpeper on US 522 we passed through pastoral Virginia countryside and saw a large number of Romney/Ryan signs as well as signs for House Majority Leader Eric Cantor and George Allen's Senate campaign.  We also saw large numbers of Romney/Ryan signs in Alexandria as well which gives me hope that Virginia will also return to its traditional conservatism and give its electoral votes to Romney and Ryan.

While we were in Virginia, we visited George Washington's Mount Vernon and Thomas Jefferson's Monticello.  Both of these houses and their grounds are amazing but they pale to the enormous contributions their owners made to national freedom and independence as well as to inspiring global freedom.  What would they think of the U.S. in this first November week of 2012.  On the plus side, they would be impressed by our power and prosperity but also deeply troubled by our enduring addiction to economic debt and parsimoniousness.  I also expect they would be appalled by our moral decline and by the large numbers of people directly dependent on governmental assistance.  We also drove by the entrance to James Madison's Montpelier near Orange, VA.  I suspect the Constitution's father would be appalled by Obamacare and by the Supreme Court's egregiously flawed interpretation that the Constitution's taxation powers make this excrescent statute constitutional.  

Americans have a profound but simple choice.  Reverse this decline and start the long road back by electing Mitt Romney or choose to embrace Barack Obama's road to serfdom and continued national economic, international, and moral decline.  Elect a President who inspires us to strive for the better angels of our nature or reelect an egocentric twit who wants to blame everyone but himself for his leadership failings.  Despite the often contradictory nature of public opinion polls, I believe Romney's electoral vote total will be somewhere in the 280s as opposed to Obama's in the 250s.  I pray those Americans who voted early demonstrated Biblical wisdom in their choice and I pray for the same wisdom and values to inform those voting tomorrow.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Romney Must Attack Obama on Libya

The presidential campaign has resumed its race to the finish following a hiatus after the ravages of Hurricane Sandy on the Atlantic Coast.  Varying polls show the race to be essentially deadlocked.  Romney has made ground with his appeal to independents by focusing on Barack Obama's manifold economic failures and his calls for bipartisan cooperation.  However, Romney needs to step up the intensity and frequency of his attacks on Obama for the absolutely botched and deceitful response to the Libyan consulate bombing.  Put simply, this is the greatest diplomatic security fiasco since the Iranian hostage crisis of 1979-1981.  Thanks to the dogged work of Fox News journalists, particularly Jennifer Griffin and Katherine Herridge, we are learning how egregiously incompetent the Obama Administration's policy toward post-Qaddafi Libya has been.

We now know of repeated attacks against U.S. and western targets in Libya after Qaddafi's ouster by militant Islamist groups prior to the Sept. 11 attack.  We also know that repeated warnings about the deteriorating security situation in Libya were sent by U.S. diplomatic personnel on the scene to the State Department with no tangible or positive response given by Hillary Clinton and the administration.  We know the administration had the opportunity to commit military and intelligence assets to defend the Benghazi compound but refused to do so.  We also know that cables from the consulate doubted the ability of that facility and its onsite security to withstand a concerted terrorist assault.  We also know that the night of the attack the administration refused to assemble an interagency terrorism response group to coordinate a response to this attack on sovereign U.S. soil.

While there is a State Department interagency board investigating this scandal, along with State Dept. Inspector General and congressional investigations, these will not complete their findings for several months.  It is absolutely imperative that Romney spend the remainder of his campaign driving a stake through Obama's heart for his absolute incompetence and deceit on this issue, his fallaciously blaming an amateurish video instead of confronting the ugly reality of a resurgent Al Qaida and Islamist terrorism, and his own egocentric determination to preserve his political career at all costs including the lives of Ambassador Stevens and three other  Americans.  We need a present who will defend our diplomatic and strategic interests with Palmerstonian ferocity instead of multicultural ambivalence and moral relativism.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Monday's Upcoming Foreign Policy Debate

Paul Ryan performed solidly in his debate with Joe Biden and Romney did well in last Tuesday's debate with Obama at Hofstra University.  Unfortunately, Mitt missed an opportunity to drive an ice pick through Obama's lame and petulant defense of his administration's botched response to the murderous Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya.  Monday, Romney must take the opportunity to explain to the American people that Obama's conflicting and deceitful response to this tragedy, as well as the failure to anticipate such an attack on 9/11 and properly reinforce U.S. personnel in Libya, demonstrates that Obama is unfit to serve as Commander-in-Chief and must be replaced.

Obama Administration personnel are so inculcated into the cult of multiculturalism, that they are still unable to face the reality of Islamist terrorism after nearly four years of power.  They seek to blame amateur videographers, desire to congenitally apologize for imagined western "sins" against Islam, and don't have the moral courage or intellectual substance to tell the American people and the international community that we are in a protracted generations long struggle against militant Islam.  We need to accept the reality that the Arab Spring has become a nightmare for individuals seeking relief from existing corrupt tyrannies only to plunge into sadistic Islamist regimes desirous of driving their country and the region into a medieval time warp.  Romney needs to explain that the Obama Administration's delusional naiveté toward the Arab Spring and militant Islam will increase the danger to our national security interests, Americans living, working, and traveling in the Mideast, and to our closet ally Israel.  Obama's insistence on leading from behind has allowed our enemies in the region, most prominently Iran, to go on the march against a weak-willed west.

The Obama Administration has failed to tell Americans that Al Qaida is bigger than Osama bin Laden or any other individual.  It is a highly decentralized and agile organization with branches in the Horn of Africa, Yemen, North Africa, Iraq, as well as in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Its evil messianic objectives will survive the elimination of any of its leaders.  Our withdrawal from Iraq and impending 2014 withdrawal from Afghanistan only emboldens this organization in its goal to eliminate U.S. influence from the Mideast.

Romney also needs to forcefully explain on Monday night that our domestic economic weakness exacerbates our international political and military decline.  Nation's which are highly in debt cannot spend the resources necessary to defend their vital interests and export the products and services which improve our standard of living and overall economic competitiveness.  Romney should assail the administration for its failure to achieve additional free trade agreements with other countries while Obama has obsequiously pandered to protectionist unionist tendencies.  He has failed to pursue growth oriented economic policies and sought to restrict our ability to grow through short-term pump priming economic stimulus packages and ruinously interventionist health care legislation instead of unleashing the dynamism of our economy.

Romney also needs to tell Americans that China is going to become increasingly hostile to us as its wealth and national power increase, that we must be prepared to take military action against Iran, and that Russia cannot be relied on to support U.S. strategic interests due to its continued adherence to Soviet era paranoia.  Romney needs to bluntly tell Obama that he has failed to protect and advance our national security interests and that America must remain the preeminent power on the international political stage.  Leading from behind is a vacuous and dangerous slogan.  Real leadership requires a President who will not apologize for America's exceptional historical, contemporary, and future destiny in guiding global aspirations for greater freedom.  Mitt Romney is the leader capable of fulfilling American national interests due to his wisdom, courage, realism, and integrity. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Solid Night For Mitt!

It was a solid and convincing victory for Mitt Romney.  He kept his cool and demonstrated his unequivocal intellectual superiority over Barack Obama.  I'm glad the debate allowed for some free flowing exchanges instead of being a overly scripted press conference.  Obama couldn't handle hearing his policies being dismantled and dissected by Romney who is a true policy wonk.  The President was extremely uncomfortable as Romney schooled him on his administration's domestic policy failures.  Four years ago, the country let itself be seduced by blarney about change we can believe in.  Obama's record of abject failure demonstrates his presidency has been four years of failed statist rhetoric and policies, increased debt, and decreased international strength and credibility.  Romney also showed his genuine empathy for the individuals and families injured by Obama's arrogance and incompetence.  Mitt will need to continue his amiable but aggressive attacks in subsequent debates.  We now can look forward to seeing Paul Ryan continue the assault against Joe Biden in next week's vice-presidential debate.  Tonight is a night for hope and confidence but much work needs to be done to end the incompetence, corruption, and despair of Barack Obama's presidency.  Chris Matthew's angry and despondent response is especially delightful.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What Romney Must Say in the Debates

I'll add my "two cents worth" to the advice Mitt Romney is getting about what to say in the upcoming debates with Barack Obama.  Romney needs to begin by emphasizing that this is a seismic election which will determine whether the American economy remains an exceptional free market economy offering limitless opportunity to Americans other whether it descends to become a stagnant statist monstrosity plagued by unsustainable debt, increasing governmental control over the economy, and a leviathan with an increasing number of people dependent on governmental transfers for their economic well-being.

Romney will be right to explain the manifold economic failures of the Obama Administration including its failure to reduce the budget deficit, create more jobs, drastically increasing the national debt, and the onerous burdens of his signature health care reform.  What he needs to do is tell Americans how these failures are increasing their personal share of the national debt, how they will keep employers from hiring for new jobs, how they will make us increasingly vulnerable to external holders of national debt, how it will become more expensive to heat and cool our homes, and drive our cars due to the Obama Administration's hostility to traditional energy producers and its crony capitalism embrace of dubious green energy alternatives.  Romney must also candidly tell Americans that the continuation of Obama Administration policies will result in economic unrest and social dislocation as has been witnessed in European countries such as Spain and Greece.  He must also tell Americans that tough steps must be taken to reform economically unsustainable entitlement programs such as Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security and that this can be done by rediscovering America's traditional economic emphasis on saving and planning for our future economic needs.  He also needs to tell Americans that they were foolish to fall for Obama's Keynesian policies which have historically failed and still fail the test of improving American economic standards and reducing national debt.  Where taxes are concerned, Romney needs to explain that tax cuts benefit ALL Americans and that tax increases depress and crush the potential for individual and national economic growth and prosperity and that politicians should not promote class hatred.

Where foreign and national security policy is concerned, he must remind Americans that we still live in a dangerous world and that apologies do not produce a credible foreign policy when dealing with radical Islamists and surging Chinese nationalism.  The debacle of the murder of the U.S. Ambassador to Libya and the failure of the Administration to get FBI investigators on the scene three weeks after this tragedy is a result of supine weakness and cowardice.  We need to learn to follow the Italian theorist Niccolo Machiavelli's maxim that it is better to be feared than loved when dealing with evil insurgents and dictators.  Romney needs to frankly tell the American people that it is highly likely we will need to take military action against Iran and that, despite killing Osama bin Laden, that Al Qaida is not a spent force and we will need to combat militant Islam for lifetimes to come.  Romney needs to tell Obama to his face that his naive appeasement of militant Islam has been a pathetic failure and produced the deaths of Americans and endangered our long-term national strategic interests.  We need a President who is more concerned with protecting the American people and U.S. national interests instead of groveling before Islamist thugs.  We need a President who demonstrates Palmerstonian wrath when our diplomatic personnel are attacked and killed instead of a Islamist lickspittle who blames an amateurish video that offends an alleged "religious prophet" and his followers instead of boldly defending freedom of speech.

Romney needs to explain that you cannot separate personal morality from societal economic health and national prosperity.  For to long our country has fallen into the trap of secularist moral relativism and believed that breaking up the nuclear family and promoting aberrant sexual behavior, including illegitimate births, does not have long-term economic and social consequences.  The debates are a crucial opportunity for Romney to be a bold revolutionary leader capable of winning the confidence of the electorate and showing them that he and Paul Ryan are the only candidates capable of beginning the painful process or American economic restoration, promoting personal economic empowerment and responsibility, and restoring American to its leadership role on the international stage.  Both Romney and Ryan need to tell Obama and Biden that they have had their time in the son, have proven to be abject failures, and that it is time for them to go.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Campaign Commences

Last night Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan were nominated as the GOP presidential and vice-presidential candidates.  Consequently, a truly epochal political campaign begins.  This will be an election of seismic significance.  We can continue down the road to economic serfdom and governmental dependency which Barack Obama and Joe Biden offer and sought to deliver, or we can rededicate ourselves to a free market opportunity society that seeks to empower individuals instead of enslaving them to government.  We need to restore national fiscal solvency or we will drown in debt and become vulnerable to foreign exploitation.

Socially and morally this election also represents a Kulturkampf.   By this, I don't mean Bismarckian Germany's ill-advised struggle against the Roman Catholic church.  I mean a moral struggle for the soul of our country and its future direction.  As a general rule, Mitt Romney and the 2012 GOP stand for traditional moral values such as defending unborn children, promoting traditional marriage and sexual mores, and pursuing policies to bolster two-parent families.  Barack Obama and the Democrats favor increasing secularization and outright hostility to traditional religious beliefs and moral values.  We see this in their advocacy of unrestricted abortion, same-sex marriage, and the efforts of allied groups such as Freedom from Religion to remove all traces of Judeo-Christian belief from the public square.  Democrat advocacy of moral licentiousness is also reflected in their giving a national convention speaking platform to subsidized promiscuity apologist Sandra Fluke.  I suspect she and "Lady" Gaga will write the family policy planks of the Democrats platform.

This election will also have tectonic foreign policy and national security consequences.  If we continue with Obama, we will experience ongoing political and military decline.  Iran will acquire nuclear weapons and will not hesitate to use them against Israel, the U.S., or other pro-western governments.  China will continue increasing its power in the South China Sea, may attempt to conquer Taiwan, and will develop a blue water navy to extend its reach to the Indian Ocean in order to gain dependable access to Middle East and African fossil fuels.  The Mexican border will become increasingly unstable due to our nonexistent immigration enforcement policies, Russia will seek to increase its coercive energy influence over Eastern and Central Europe, and countries as diverse as Poland and Israel will find that the U.S. cannot be relied upon.

Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan will restore fiscal solvency with much hard work against strenuous opposition from the Democrats parasitic constituencies, defend traditional social values against secularist onslaughts in areas such as sexual morality, and restore America's sense of foreign policy direction and national security assertiveness and coherence.  Barack Obama and Joe Biden have no positive alternatives or accomplishments to present and will rely on lies, distortion, and class hatred to retain political power.  Fortunately, Mitt and Paul have proven adept in rapidly responding to Democratic demagoguery and this will need to continue as the campaign progresses.

Last night's GOP convention in Tampa was a good start at presenting the credible and essential alternative the GOP presents.  I was inspired by the numerous small business entrepreneurs who presented their story including a Japanese-American farmer from Colorado.  I enjoyed many speeches including Ann Romney's (what a great first lady she'll be), Gov. Chris Christie's eloquent and forceful description of real leadership, Utah congressional candidate Mia Love, and South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley's description of her battles with Obama's National Labor Relations Board over trying to get Boeing to locate in South Carolina.  (By the way, Gov. Haley is the most beautiful  governor in American History and tonight we get to hear from Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi who is the most beautiful Attorney General in American History!)

It will be nice to hear Condoleezza Rice's speech tonight plus the speech by New Mexico Governor Susana Martinez.  Both of these speeches will demonstrate that it's in the best interest of all Americans, regardless of their ethnicity, to support the Romney-Ryan ticket because it enables them to reach their God-given potential instead of adhering to the Democrats tired mantra of victimization and governmental dependency.  Finally, we get to hear Paul Ryan present his vision of how to restore the American dream of unlimited personal and national economic opportunity.  I can't wait to see Ryan demolish bombastic Joe Biden in their debate in a few weeks. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ryan's Selection and the Campaign Ahead

Although I recently said Paul Ryan, was my third choice for Romney's running mate, I am pleased he was selected.  This means that Romney is a bold leader who will fight for conservative policymaking programs and values and intellectually slug it out with Barack Obama's decrepit liberalism.  Paul Ryan is a true policy wonk and a federal budget scholar.  As House Budget Committee chair he has passed two budgets through the House only to see them stalled in the Democratic controlled Senate.  Its extremely hypocritical for Democrats to call him extreme, when their own budgetary and legislative incompetence during the Obama Administration has failed to produce an enacted budget in over three years.  To make this situation even worse, the true ideological extremism of the Obama Administration in its reckless spending has exacerbated our national debt beyond what was cumulatively accumulated during all prior presidencies.

Ryan's presence in the campaign will, hopefully, allow for an adult conversation on federal entitlements.  These entitlement programs, characterized most prominently by Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security are the primary drivers of our exploding national debt and federal budget deficit.    A 2011 Congressional Research Service report, citing Congressional Budget Office statistics, notes that these three entitlement programs constitute 43% of the federal budget.  In contrast, the Defense Budget, demonized by many leftists as the principal cause of national budget problems, represents an estimated 18.1% of the federal budget in Fiscal Year 2012 according to the Office of Management and Budget.  This does not factor in the draconian defense spending cuts that are set to take place if sequestration occurs on January 1, 2013.

Our continually growing population and improved health care have enhanced the population of elderly adults and produced drastic and unsustainable increases in health care spending which are driving entitlement costs increases beyond contributions to these programs.    The Government Accountability Office's January 2010 report "The Federal Government's Long-Term Fiscal Outlook" has some interesting observations and projections about entitlement programs and the federal budget.  These include:

2008 Oldest members of the baby-boom generation become eligible for early Social Security retirement benefits.
2008 Medicare Hospital Insurance expenditures exceed cash income.
2010 Social Security runs first cash deficit since 1984.
2011 Oldest baby-boom generation members become eligible for Medicare
2014 45% of Medicare outlays funded by general revenue
2016 Social Security begins running consistent annual cash deficits and redeeming trust fund assets such as nonmarketable Treasury securities in order to pay beneficiaries.
2017 Medicare Hospital Insurance trust fund exhausted.  Income sufficient to pay about 81% of benefits.
2020 Debt held by public under GAO Alternative simulation exceeds the historical high reached in World War II's aftermath (p. 2)

This crisis has been a long-time building and will take painful steps to solve these problems.  History, unfortunately has demonstrated that Barack Obama and other Democrats refuse to engage in honest debate about this problem and appeal to emotion and outright lies.  Ryan's Medicare reforms WILL NOT affect anyone over 55,  However, we must begin planning for future generations and give them the option to possess private health insurance for their older years if they choose to do so.  Unfortunately, many self-appointed seniors organizations such as the infamous American Association for Retired Persons (AARP) have no intellectual or moral conception of the grievous fiscal consequences of maintaining present entitlement programs.

They represent a Greedy Geezer mentality that was, ironically, depicted in the March 28, 1988 cover story "Talkin Bout My Generation" featured in the liberal New Republic.  Leftist organizations such as AARP and its multiple allies are willing to maintain often extravagant demands for federal benefits without thinking about the consequences of such profligacy for future generations including their children and grandchildren let alone national economic solvency.

This election will go a long way in determining if we can recover some semblance of national fiscal solvency and seek to empower individuals to reach their maximum personal or economic potential if they choose Mitt Romney's and Paul Ryan's visions for America.  On the other hand, if we choose to embrace Barack Obama's and Joe Biden's vision of class warfare, statist dependency on governmental handouts, and unsustainable federal budgets and national debt, we will lose control of our personal and national economic sovereignty and become shackled slaves on a plantation like socioeconomic structure of governmental servitude destined for inevitable collapse and societal disintegration.

While Medicare has some benefits, it is an inefficient and fraud ridden program that does not meet emerging personal health care, demographic, or economic needs and realities.  You can visit the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission website to learn more about Medicare's accelerating financial problems. The sad truth is that national governments, whether in the U.S. or elsewhere, do not do a good job at providing customer focused and cost effective health care.  Paul Ryan has the political courage and intellectual prowess to convince Americans of this reality and that we must take drastic steps to alter the financially unsustainable course our nation is on.  We urgently need the wisdom and leadership he and Mitt Romney are capable of providing us if we are to begin the long and painful process of restoring American economic growth and entreprenurial dynamism.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Media Misrepresentation and Romney's Foreign Trip

If anyone still doubts that the mainstream media serves as loyal water carriers for Barack Obama, they should have paid attention to its coverage of Mitt Romney's just concluded trip to the United Kingdom, Israel, and Poland.  Recognizing that Obama is a failed President, but unwilling to give up their secularist and Keynesian dreams, the traditional networks will say and do anything to take Romney down a notch.  Let's start with the British trip.

As a the rescuer of the Salt Lake City Winter Olympics, Romney wanted to see how London was preparing for the Olympics and to cheer on our athletes.  He was quoted as saying he didn't know how good British security would be.  The fact of the matter is that since he was not in charge of London Olympic security arrangements, he did not have access to the information about how the British were conducting security arrangements.  Yet, media distortion and failure to understand the context of his comments provoked a brouhaha and an unnecessary rebuke of Romney from Prime Minister David Cameron.

Turning to Israel, Romney held important meetings with Prime Minister Netanyahu and President Peres as well as visiting the Wailing Wall.  He declared the U.S.' unshakable friendship and alliance with Israel and also had the audacity to proclaim that culture affects countries economic performance and vitality.  For speaking this quintessential truth, Romney was targeted by petulant Palestineans who have mastered the vernacular of leftist victimization.  They instinctively trotted out the discredited bromide of racism and failed to accept the reality that their terrorist proclivities, not Israeli occupation, have kept them from achieving their economic potential.    The fact of the matter is that culture affects individual and national economic performance.  Romney properly cited David Landes seminal work The Wealth and Poverty of Nations:  Why Some are So Rich and Some Are So Poor to buttress his argument.  Romney could also have cited Thomas Sowell's Race and Culture for further reinforcement.

Romney also demonstrated great appreciation for Poland's current economic achievements, participation and sacrifices in Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom, and sensitivity to its role as a victim of totalitarian oppression from both Germany and the Soviet Union.  He paid respect to Polish war dead and to the signal accomplishments of Pope John Paul II.  Yet, the media kept complaining that he would not play their rhetorical word games which prompted a Romney advisor to tell the media to kiss his posterior due to their failure to recognize that Romney was visiting an important place in Poland's historical consciousness.

Despite these media distractions and distortions, Romney demonstrated that he is a knowledgeable student of international affairs, economics, and history who looks and sounds presidential.  He will support our allies with out hesitation and not pander to leftist ideological nostrums like Barack Obama.  If Romney becomes President, Poland can be reassured that we will keep a tight grip on dictatorial regimes like Belarus and a potentially revanchist Russia.  Israel can rest assured that a President Romney will understand its security needs and vulnerabilities and give it whatever assistance it requires to maintain and enhance its national freedom and sovereignty.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

GOP Vice-Presidential Speculation

As summer's heat ebbs and flows, the blogosphere and traditional media are a twitter with prognostications and speculations about Mitt Romney's potential Vice-Presidential running mate.  There is also considerable hypothesizing about whether Romney will wait until the GOP convention in several weeks or whether he'll pull the plug early.  Numerous factors have gone in to selecting a party's vice-presidential candidate.  These have included smoke-filled back rooms involving party bosses, the desire for geographic regional or partisan ideological balance, possessing skill sets and experiences not held by the presidential candidate, and various other substantive and mundane factors.

The most important factor Romney should choose is someone who's capable of assuming the presidency at a moment's notice and continue moving administration policy and the national interest forward.  The Vice-President must be a man or woman or experience, substance, and high moral character of above all other factors.

My first choice is Florida Senator Marco Rubio.  We need not reprise Rubio's compelling personal story.  He truly exemplifies the American dream and is developing a strong record as a principled and substantive Senator where his policy interests include immigration and international affairs.  He's a compelling orator who will energize the conservative base.  He will reflect the reality that not all Hispanics have been seduced into the Democrats leftist ethnic victim and governmental dependency racket.  His selection could play electoral dividends in areas of growing Hispanic population such as Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, and elsewhere to ethnic compatriots who have seen four years of Obama's abject failure. Where raw electoral vote calculus is concerned, Florida's vital electoral votes are the deciding factor in getting to the 270 votes needed to secure the White House.  Just to see him debate the cadaverous and gaffe-prone Joe Biden alone will be priceless.

Wisconsin's Paul Ryan is another strong choice.  Ryan is a true scholar of the federal budget and his presence on the ticket will reinforce the vital importance of the national economy and that economy's future direction, viability, and sustainability.  He is solid on social issues though I don't know the extent of his foreign and national security policy views.  Although not as electoral vote rich as Florida, Wisconsin is a key midwestern bellweather state which appears to be heading in a conservative direction following Gov. Scott Walker's decisive victory in last month's recall election.

Ohio Senator Rob Portman has solid budgetary and senatorial experience.  Although some might criticize him for being head of the Bush OMB, Portman's middle class background gives him deep understanding and empathy for the lives of the silent majority and their struggles to sustain themselves in these economically challenging times.  While he is not a compelling speaker, these times require leadership of substance and grit instead of class warfare and superficial celebrity.

New Hampshire Senator Kelly Ayotte is my dark horse choice.  Before being elected to the Senate in 2010, Ayotte was an effective New  Hampshire Attorney General.  She argued a case defending traditional marriage before the Supreme Court despite the opposition of Democrat Governor John Lynch who signed execrable same-sex marriage legislation.  Ayotte is strongly pro-life and is developing a reputation for fiscal conservatism similar to her predecessor Judd Gregg.  Her husband is a small business owner and she is acutely attuned to the needs of this vitally important economic force.

  She is also  becoming a leader and gaining national security experience on the Senate Armed Services Committee.  There she has been a dogged critic of the Obama Administration's  releasing terrorists captured and held at Guantanamo Bay back on to the battlefield where they have continued their fight against American soldiers and our allies.  Ayotte knows that you cannot tolerate recidivism among these monsters and recognizes that we are fighting a war instead of street criminals.  

Adding her to the ticket would not provide regional balance.  However, there is recent historical precedent for candidates from adjoining states winning the presidency as demonstrated by the lamentable example of Bill Clinton and Al Gore in 1992.  She is a rising star within our party with sky's the limit potential and has the chance to be a nationally prominent conservative leader.  Most importantly, she is all substance, unlike Sarah Palin, and it would also be fun to see her rip Joe Biden to shreds on the debating platform.

We shall see how the VP selection process unfolds over the next several weeks.



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Campaign Begins

With Rick Santorum suspending his campaign this past week, it is now clear that Mitt Romney will be the 2012 GOP presidential nominee.  Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul may continue battling for various egocentric reasons, but the election this fall will between Romney and Obama.  It has been a challenging but refining campaign for Romney, who has improved his skills as the campaign went on and successfully adapted to changing circumstances.  The fact of the matter is that a solid plurality of GOP primary voters voted for Romney and he was not selected by a mythical party establishment conspiracy.  None of the other GOP presidential candidates was able to assemble a sufficiently financed and disciplined campaign organizational structure or has the ability to appeal beyond the conservative base.

This is a decisive election in American presidential campaign history.  It's importance will rival, if not surpass, other seminal elections such as 1860, 1912, 1932, and 1980.  Nothing less than the future direction of our country and its economic, geopolitical, and moral direction is at stake.  We can choose the continuing statist path pursued by Barack Obama which means greater governmental control of the economy, greater national debt, high unemployment, empower federal government at the expense  of individual autonomy, the continued promotion of morally depraved lifestyle choices such as abortion on demand, sexual deviance, hostility to Judeo-Christian religious belief, and increasing vulnerability to  the multiple foreign threats facing us.  Fortunately, in Mitt Romney we have the alternative of taking the tough but painful steps to restore national fiscal discipline, create more jobs, pursuing policies favoring life and traditional morality and are friendly to Judeo-Christian values, empower individuals to reach their God-given potential, give states the leverage to implement policies best suited to their needs as granted by the Constitution's 10th Amendment, and pursue a foreign policy that vigorously promotes and defends American national interests and values even if this is not popular with the chattering domestic and international classes of the leftist foreign policy aristocracy.

Except for the murders of Osama Bin Laden and other prominent Al Qaida terrorist leaders, as the result of policies adopted and implemented during the Bush Administration, Barack Obama can claim no positive or beneficial foreign and domestic policy accomplishments.  National debt is up, the unemployment rate is up, gasoline prices have skyrocketed at a level not seen since the egregiously inept Carter Administration due to the administration's delusional utopian faith in green energy and its ideological antagonism to fossil fuels.  Despite this presidency being an abject failure, Barack Obama and his minions will be helped by the bully pulpit of the presidency, the obsequious loyalty of most of the traditional media, their ability to raise tremendous amounts of money from unions and their most ideologically committee liberal followers, and their willingness to engage in unrestricted personal assaults on Romney and other individuals who seek to overturn their radical leftist agenda.

As Republicans, we must take the battle to the Obama Administration and wage the political war without mercy or regret.  We offer the American electorate a clear choice.  Choose the continued course of American decline offered by Barack Obama or choose the chance for restoring national economic solvency (painful though it will be) and the potential for a new renaissance of American economic prosperity offered by Mitt Romney.  Choose continuing  hostility to the traditional moral values characteristic of the Obama administration's social policies, or return to supporting traditional moral values and implementing them into domestic and international public policy.  No one with a scintilla of intellectual coherence can claim that there is no difference between the visions Barack Obama and Mitt Romney offer for America.  This is as black and white a presidential election as I have witnessed in my five decades of life.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Illinois Victory and Etch-A-Sketch Comment

With this weekend victory in Puerto Rico and last night's victory in Illinois, Mitt Romney took another step closer to becoming the Republican presidential nominee.  This morning's endorsement by former Florida Governor Jeb Bush is another positive indication that prominent GOP members are recognizing the reality that Romney is best suited to taking on Obama and returning the presidency to competent and moral stewardship.

Unfortunately, Romney campaign messaging was thrown off stride this morning when a senior Romney advisor said that the campaign would "take an etch-a-sketch" approach to the general election campaign and supposedly "discard" partisan rhetoric.  Increasingly desperate Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum campaigns, along with the Obama campaign, jumped on this like a cat attacks catnip.  These individuals and organizations claimed it reflects a janus-faced persona by Romney and that he will say and do anything to win the election.  This sentiment, of course, is flat out nonsense!  Primary campaigns are geared toward winning the support of a party's core supporters in order to win the primary election and gain the right to compete in the general election.  Anyone who knows anything about American politics, and that apparently doesn't include people in the Gingrich and Santorum campaigns, realizes that general election campaign strategy requires balancing appeals to your party's base with rhetoric and policies designed to appeal to the broader electorate who are not directly affiliated with your party but may be receptive to your candidate's policy proposals and political message.   Neither Gingrich or Santorum have the financial resources, personal appeal, or organizational management to win the GOP presidential nomination and appeal to voters beyond the base of GOP primary voters.

It's time for Gingrich, Santorum, Paul, and their followers to accept the reality that a solid and decisive plurality of Republican primary voters want Mitt Romney to be our presidential nominee.  Consequently, we need to concentrate our resources and energies on defeating the failed presidency of Barack Obama despite the estimated $1 billion in resources he and his Chicago cronies will spend to lie about his failed record and seek to destroy the hopeful and conservative policy alternatives Mitt Romney proposes for America.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Santorum's Inconsistencies

Rick Santorum has attracted the support of many evangelicals due to his strong defense of traditional Christian values.  However, Protestants should be troubled by his ultramontane rhetoric which makes him appear "more Catholic than the Pope."  The most troubling demonstration of this came in a 2008 speech he made to Ave Maria University.  In this speech he proclaimed:

  We all know that this country was founded on a Judeo-Christian but the Judeo-Christian ethic was a Protestant Judeo-Christian
   ethic, sure the Catholics  had some influence, but this was a protestant country and the Protestant ethic, mainstream, mainline    
   Protestantism, and of course we look at the shape of mainline Protestantism in this country and it is in shambles, it is gone
   from the world of Christianity as I see it.

There is some truth to this statement but it also applies to American Roman Catholicism.  No branch of American or global Christianity has been immune from secularism and moral relativism.  We see this as all sectors of Christendom have embraced non-Biblical norms of sexual expression or sought to compromise with secular beliefs in sexuality and other areas of life. What is troubling is Santorum's apparent embrace of Catholicism as the sole acceptable form of Christianity.  Has he not learned anything from the Protestant Reformation or developments within Catholicism since Vatican II?  The conservative movement has experienced significant success as conservative Protestants and Catholics have taken their biblically based views to cooperate together on issues such as fighting abortion and promoting traditional marriage against the insidious onslaughts of individuals and organizations opposed to these core moral beliefs.  It would be an absolute tragedy for conservative values and incorporating conservatism into governmental policymaking, if Santorum takes the position that his interpretation of Catholicism is the only acceptable expression of Judeo-Christian political activism.

Santorum also raised secularist eyebrows when he said Satan was attacking America.  I'm an American exceptionalist as much as the next conservative, but Santorum needs to understand that Satan's evil attacks transcend all national, racial, and gender boundaries.  Truly effective exponents of a biblical world view must take a global perspective of Christ's redemptive message and not engage in a narrow nationally centered fixation on evil.  Ongoing events in Iran, North Korea, Syria, Venezuela, and numerous other locales demonstrate that the devil and his minions are not limited to the United States.

Santorum has also gone a sad metamorphosis in his attitudes toward Mitt Romney.  Four years ago, he enthusiastically endorsed Romney proclaiming that Romney spoke with clarity and conviction, that he knew what being commander in chief means, that he possessed deep national security knowledge, and that Romney was the candidate who would best represent our conservative values.  Unfortunately, Rick Santorum has forgotten his past wise words and let his own lust for power, and the desire for avenging his 2006 Pennsylvania Senate loss, to cloud and warp his judgment.  You can see this when he lamely attacks Romney for the Massachusetts health care plan, even though Romney has repeatedly made it clear that this plan was intended solely for Massachusetts and was not a template for national health care policymaking.

Despite his many laudable attributes, Rick Santorum will be unable to appeal beyond a limited ideologically conservative base if he becomes the GOP nominee.  Consequently, we will be subjected to another four years of Barack Obama in the White House and potentially a reprise of the heavily Democratic 111th Congress.   Mitt Romney has the calm reassuring and resolute leadership this country needs as it enters perilous domestic and international waters brought about by Barack Obama's egregious incompetence.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Santorum's Surge

Rick Santorum has enjoyed a remarkable surge in the GOP presidential primaries thanks to his victories in Colorado, Minnesota, and Missouri although there was fairly low turnout in all of these races.  There is much to admire about Santorum including his strong stands on national security issues with particular emphasis on his visionary warnings on the threat posed by Iran.  I'm glad he has partially called Ron Paul to task on this.  Santorum is also a staunch defender of traditional moral values including the rights of the unborn and for his vigorous defense of traditional marriage.  Unfortunately, his unswerving criticism of contraception, will not go over well with swing voters who do not see women as living for the purpose of being baby factories. Mitt Romney has rightly pointed out that birth control is working and its pointless to try to reverse the Supreme Court's Griswold decision.

Santorum, unfortunately, has economic policy weaknesses which make him unsuited to be the President at this critical economic time. While he is right to emphasize the importance of manufacturing in our economic activity, he has a nostalgic and romantic view about manufacturing's preeminent role in the U.S. economy which no longer fits current and emerging national and international economic realities.  Conservatives rightly criticize the Obama Administration for favoring "green industries" in their economic policymaking as evidenced by the Solyndra fiasco.  We should also criticize Santorum for his giving political preference to traditional manufacturing in his economic policymaking.  The government should create conditions and establish policies favorable to all sectors of economic activity without showing favor to any single sector.  An article in the current National Review online also criticizes Santorum for his sentimental and nostalgic view toward working class Reagan Democrats which it contends no longer exist as they did in 1980 and have become more secularized in their values.

There is also criticism of Santorum's support for earmarks.  Some earmarks can be beneficial and some are true examples of pork. One of Santorum's most troubling examples of earmark support was his encouraging Cheney University and another historically black college in Pennsylvania to come to a  Department of Education seminar to learn about how to get more federal money.  It is true that many of these universities, created by the 1890 Morrill Land Grant, have been financially underfunded.  We must also remember though that these universities are a shameful legacy of racial segregation which was legally concluded by passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and 1965 Voting Rights Act.  Since traditional public and private higher education has been desegregrated for several decades, the presence of historically black colleges remains an example of promoting ethnic separatism and they should be closed and their students, staff, and faculty absorbed into existing universities within their respective states.

You can criticize Santorum for his support of earmarks such as the Bridge to Nowhere and, in particular, his support for the unfunded Medicare Prescription Drug Act which has increased our budget deficit when prescription drug reform legislation should have been enacted that would have created more competition in the pharmaceutical industry.  Because Santorum is from organized labor heavy Pennsylvania, he has opposed right to work legislation which is critically important to enhancing economic growth and prosperity.  As a congressman, he opposed the NAFTA agreement which has brought significant benefits to the U.S. and has tended to favor protectionist measures in his career.  More than ever, we need a President who will actively seek to promote the ability of U.S. companies to export their products and services to all countries of the world and push for more free trade agreements. Rick Santorum is not that individual while Mitt Romney is.

Santorum is also off-base in his criticisms of the Massachusetts health care plan Romney introduced while governor.  Massachusetts was confronted with the problem of numerous people trying to exploit the state's health care system by not having their own health insurance by trying to get free emergency room care for non-threatening medical conditions.  Romney, working with the conservative Heritage Foundation, sought to develop a plan that would fit state needs and the perceived desires of Massachusett's population.  This is perfectly consistent with the federalist principles enunciated in the Constitution's 10th Amendment and is not a precursor to the one-size-fits-all monstrosity Obama is seeking to impose.  One can legitimately debate how well or poorly this program has worked since Romney left his gubernatorial responsibilities, but responsibility for this program's continued performance rests on the shoulders of Deval Patrick who succeeded Romney as Massachusetts governor.  Santorum and other GOP critics of Romney health care policy continually forget that he has said this program was never intended for national application and that he would repeal Obamacare if he becomes President.  Santorum also needs to present credible alternatives for reducing unnecessary medical expenses which drive up public and private sector health care costs instead of sanctimoniously criticizing Romney.  For instance, what is Santorum's stance on Paul Ryan's entitlement reform proposals?

Santorum does not have the executive experience and temperament necessary to be President.  Although he says things that make conservatives feel good, a warm glow in our hearts is not enough to be an effective President or appeal to individuals who do not adhere to all tenets of conservative ideology.   I could easily see Santorum as Secretary of Health and Human Services, perhaps Secretary of Defense, and especially as a director of family policy within the White House.  His personality, character, and professional connections would all serve him well in those positions.

The next President must be a strong and decisive leader with executive and managerial experience who can reach beyond the conservative bedrock to offer pragmatic and principled solutions to pressing national policy programs and to emerging threats to U.S. national security interests.   Unpopular though this may be in Michigan, Romney was right to criticize the federal bailout of General Motors and Chrysler because those two companies had become bloated and inefficient and needed to go through normal bankruptcy procedures. The next President must also be, in the words of the late William F. Buckley, the most electable conservative and someone who can repair the damage done by Barack Obama and begin the long and painful process of restoring American exceptionalism.  Mitt Romney is that individual and I urge Michigan primary voters to support him on February 28.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

South Carolina Primary

South Carolina's primary results are disappointing but we must remember that this is a long-term battle for the party's nomination. Gingrich's impassioned debate performances seduced enough of the Palmetto state's voters to give his campaign an additional resurrection.  Gingrich's energetic debate responses to annoying questions from journalists are not enough to produce presidential credibility.  The former speaker's indulging in George Soros and Occupy Wall Street rhetoric to bash Mitt Romney's business accomplishments plays into the Obama Administration's campaign strategy and will, as Romney asserted tonight, come back to bite us in the fall campaign if Gingrich is the GOP nominee.

Mitt, unfortunately, made some mistakes in South Carolina.  His debate performances were insufficiently passionate and he needs to be more aggressive in defending his tenure at Bain and the moral superiority of free market capitalism.  He also seriously failed by not releasing his tax returns and should do so as soon as possible as the campaign moves to Florida..  Frankly, many of us could learn some could tax deduction tips from seeing his returns.  Romney also needs to get more aggressive in pointing out  Gingrich's manifold character flaws, his undisciplined leadership as House Speaker which would be reflected if  he becomes President, and ruthlessly exploit Gingrich's tendency to shoot from the hip by point out the dangers this poses in domestic and international leadership. Gingrich's tacit acceptance of Ron Paul's conspiratorial fantasies about the Federal Reserve Board in his victory speech tonight is a good line of attack for Romney to pursue. It's time to drive a stake into Gingrich's heart and keep this primary season from going on for to long because we must put the bulk of our passion and financial treasure into defeating Barack Obama and his billion dollar agitprop machine.

Romney also needs to continue appealing to Americans best aspirations and demonstrate that his policies will restore economic prosperity and enable individual Americans and their families to reach their optimum God given potential.  He needs to work to improve his connection to average Americans and demonstrate that his brand of conservatism is more likely to produce desirable economic improvements and enhance our standing in the world than Newt Gingrich's rambling and undisciplined rhetorical flights of fancy and xenophobic appeals to regional prejudice such as calling Romney a "Massachusetts moderate."  Such regional insularity and hostility toward New England should have died with the Civil War and are unworthy of educated southerners and America's rich conservative tradition. Despite the Bay State's descent into liberal folly over recent decades, Romney demonstrates that conservatism still plays a role in the northeast and he has been supported by other northeastern conservatives such as Harvard historian Niall Ferguson and Harvard law school professor Mary Ann Glendon.

It's on to Florida and, hopefully, Mitt will regain his momentum and passion and win a victory to take a step closer to winning the GOP nomination and begin reclaiming our country from the disastrous Barack Obama experiment.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12Next »